Developer Kit
Spec-First Enforcer
Produces a structured specification with problem definition, inputs, outputs, constraints, and success criteria before any implementation begins. Useful for preventing semantic drift and aligning on scope before writing code. Engineers working on non-trivial features, tech leads who want to enforce design-before-code discipline, developers working with AI agents and tired of re-doing work because the agent solved the wrong problem. the implementation solves a slightly different problem than the one the developer had in mind. The fix is not better AI; it is a clear spec before code is written. Teams skip this step because writing a spec feels slower than writing code — but a 10-minute spec saves a 2-hour retrofit. A structured enforcer turns "write the spec" into a fast, templated exercise that produces a reviewable artifact and a go/no-go readiness score.
One-Time Purchase
$19.99
Spec — User Notification Preferences
Size: Small–Medium (half to one day of work) Readiness: CONDITIONAL — 2 open questions blocking implementation
Problem Definition
Users currently receive all platform notifications with no ability to control frequency, channel, or type. This creates alert fatigue, causes users to disable notifications entirely, and results in missed high-priority events. Users need a self-service preference center where they can configure what they hear about and how.
Users
Primary: Authenticated end-users managing their own accounts Secondary: Workspace admins who may set notification defaults or enforce org-wide policies
Inputs
- User's current notification preferences (read from
user_preferencesstore) - Available notification types (sourced from a registry — see Open Question #1)
- Supported delivery channels: in-app, email (SMS not in scope — see Non-Goals)
- Admin-configured policy constraints (e.g., mandatory security alerts cannot be disabled)
Outputs
- Updated preference record persisted to
user_preferences - Confirmation message shown inline after save
- Audit log entry: who changed what, and when
Constraints
- Changes must take effect within one platform event cycle (no lag longer than ~30 seconds)
- Admin-enforced preferences must be visibly locked in the UI — user sees them but cannot toggle them
- Preference reads must not add more than 50ms to page load (cached reads expected)
- No email or push sending logic lives in this feature — this is preference storage only
Non-Goals
- SMS / push notification channels
- Notification scheduling ("only notify me between 9am–5pm")
- Per-item muting (e.g., muting a single document vs. a category)
- Admin ability to blast-override individual user preferences
- Digest / batching configuration
Success Criteria
- A user can change a preference and the next qualifying notification respects that change within 30 seconds
- Locked admin preferences render as read-only with visible explanation text; no silent enforcement
- Preference save completes in under 400ms at p95 under normal load
- Zero preference changes are lost under concurrent save (last-write-wins with optimistic locking is acceptable if documented)
- Audit log entry is present for every preference mutation — verified by integration test
Open Questions
| # | Question | Owner | Blocker? | |---|----------|-------|----------| | 1 | Is the notification type registry static (hardcoded list) or dynamic (fetched at runtime)? Dynamic requires a loading state and error handling path that static does not. | Backend lead | Yes | | 2 | Can workspace admins set default preferences for new users, or only enforce mandatory ones? Defaults = pre-population logic; enforcement = lock UI. These are meaningfully different builds. | Product | Yes |
Completeness Scorecard
| Section | Status | Notes | |---------|--------|-------| | Problem definition | ✅ Complete | | | Users | ✅ Complete | | | Inputs | ⚠️ Partial | Notification type source unresolved (OQ #1) | | Outputs | ✅ Complete | | | Constraints | ✅ Complete | | | Non-goals | ✅ Complete | | | Success criteria | ✅ Complete | | | Open questions | ⚠️ Partial | 2 blocking questions unanswered |
Readiness Score: 6 / 8 sections fully resolved
Verdict: CONDITIONAL ⚠️
Implementation must not begin until Open Questions #1 and #2 are answered. Both affect scope and component structure. Answering them requires no additional research — only a 30-minute product and backend sync.
Once resolved, update the Inputs section and Admin behavior under Constraints, then re-score.
Reviewer Checklist
Before approving this spec for implementation, confirm:
- [ ] OQ #1 resolved: registry type documented and input section updated accordingly
- [ ] OQ #2 resolved: admin capability (defaults vs. enforcement) reflected in Inputs and Constraints
- [ ] Success criteria are testable as written — no criterion reads as "it works"
- [ ] Non-goals have been acknowledged by product (no scope creep items hiding in them)
- [ ] Locked-preference UX has a design reference or explicit owner before build starts
- [ ] Audit log format agreed upon with the team receiving those logs
View full sample →
All sales final. No refunds on digital products.
Includes support for Claude Code, Codex, and OpenClaw in the same license.
What You Get With This Skill
Produces a structured specification with problem definition, inputs, outputs, constraints, and success criteria before any implementation begins. Useful for preventing semantic drift and aligning on scope before writing code.
All ClearPoint Nexus Skills Include
- Production-ready workflow packaging for three supported platforms.
- Reusable structure designed for repeatable operator tasks.
- Clear deliverable format, not just raw prompt output.
Related Skills
$19.99
One-time license
$19.99
One-time license
$19.99
One-time license